Effects of beta-adrenergic blockade on verapamil-responsive and verapamil-irresponsive sustained ventricular tachycardias.

R J Sung; E C Keung; N X Nguyen; E C Huycke

doi:10.1172/JCI113374

Effects of beta-adrenergic blockade on verapamil-responsive and verapamil-irresponsive sustained ventricular tachycardias.

R J Sung, E C Keung, N X Nguyen, and E C Huycke

Published March 1, 1988 - More info

View PDF

Abstract

To assess effects of beta-adrenergic blockade on ventricular tachycardia (VT) of various mechanisms, electrophysiology studies were performed before and after intravenous infusion of propranolol (0.2 mg/kg) in 33 patients with chronic recurrent VT, who had previously been tested with intravenous verapamil (0.15 mg/kg followed by 0.005 mg/kg/min infusion). In the verapamil-irresponsive group, 10 patients (group IA) had VT that could be initiated by programmed ventricular extrastimulation and terminated by overdrive ventricular pacing, and 11 patients (group IB) had VT that could be provoked by isoproterenol infusion (3-8 micrograms/min) but not by programmed electrical stimulation, and that could not be converted to a sustained sinus rhythm by overdrive ventricular pacing. Notably, in the group IA patients, all 10 patients had structural heart disease (coronary arteriosclerosis or idiopathic cardiomyopathy); beta-adrenergic blockade accelerated the VT rate in one patient but exerted no effects on the VT rate in the remaining 9 patients, and VT remained inducible in all 10 patients. By contrast, in the group IB patients, 7 of the 11 patients had no apparent structural heart disease; beta-adrenergic blockade completely suppressed the VT inducibility during isoproterenol infusion in all 11 patients. There were 12 patients with verapamil-responsive VT (group II). 11 of the 12 patients had no apparent structural heart disease. In these patients, the initiation of VT was related to attaining a critical range of cycle lengths during sinus, atrial-paced or ventricular-paced rhythm; beta-adrenergic blockade could only slow the VT rate without suppressing its inducibility. Of note, 14 of the total 33 patients had exercise provocable VT: two in group IA, five in group IB, and seven in group II. Thus, mechanisms of VT vary among patients, and so do their pharmacologic responses. Although reentry, catecholamine-sensitive automaticity, and triggered activity related to delayed afterdepolarizations are merely speculative, results of this study indicate that beta-adrenergic blockade is only specifically effective in a subset group (group IB) of patients with VT suggestive of catecholamine-sensitive automaticity.