Certain hormonal and nonhormonal binding systems such as the leukoagglutinin-lymphocyte model exhibit complex receptor-ligand interactions that result in nonlinear Scatchard plots. Such plots are interpreted as indicating either homogeneous negatively interacting binding sites or heterogeneous sites with different and fixed affinity. We assessed the validity of these interpretations in our system by conjugating the ligand to a photoactivated heterobifunctional agent and cross-linking the conjugate to a subset of receptors before studying the binding interactions of non-cross-linked sites. Conjugation did not qualitatively or quantitatively affect the binding properties of the ligand. Cross-linking was specific, efficient, and stable and had no effect on irrelevant surface receptors. Cross-linking of only 3% of the total receptors resulted in 50% decreased ligand binding to high affinity sites consistent with a calculated inactivation of 85% and 2% of high and low affinity sites, respectively. Such preferential inactivation of high affinity sites in an unequivocal demonstration of binding sites heterogeneity in this system and shows a clear rejection of the homogeneous cooperation model.
G B Faguet, D Beebe
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 56 | 0 |
38 | 16 | |
Scanned page | 149 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 36 | 0 |
Totals | 279 | 17 |
Total Views | 296 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.