Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (41)

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI112432

Direct evidence for a stimulatory effect of hyperglycemia per se on peripheral glucose disposal in type II diabetes.

B Capaldo, D Santoro, G Riccardi, N Perrotti, and L Saccà

Find articles by Capaldo, B. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Santoro, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Riccardi, G. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Perrotti, N. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Find articles by Saccà, L. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published April 1, 1986 - More info

Published in Volume 77, Issue 4 on April 1, 1986
J Clin Invest. 1986;77(4):1285–1290. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI112432.
© 1986 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published April 1, 1986 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

The effect of hyperglycemia per se on glucose uptake by muscle tissue was quantitated in six controls and six type II diabetics by the forearm technique, under conditions of insulin deficiency induced by somatostatin (SRIF) infusion (0.7 mg/h). Blood glucose concentration was clamped at its basal value during the first 60 min of SRIF infusion and then raised to approximately 200 mg/dl by a variable glucose infusion. Plasma insulin levels remained at or below 5 microU/ml during SRIF infusion, including the hyperglycemic period. No appreciable difference between controls and diabetics was present in the basal state as to forearm glucose metabolism. After 60 min of SRIF infusion and euglycemia, forearm glucose uptake fell consistently from 2.1 +/- 0.7 mg X liter-1 X min-1 to 1.0 +/- 0.6 (P less than 0.05) and from 1.7 +/- .2 to 0.4 +/- 0.3 (P less than 0.02) in the control and diabetic groups, respectively. The subsequent induction of hyperglycemia caused a marked increase in both the arterial-deep venous blood glucose difference (P less than 0.02-0.01) and forearm glucose uptake (P less than 0.01-0.005). However, the response in the diabetic group was significantly greater than that observed in controls. The incremental area of forearm glucose uptake was 276 +/- 31 mg X liter-1 X 90 min and 532 +/- 81 in the control and diabetic groups, respectively (P less than 0.02). In the basal state, the forearm released lactate and alanine both in controls and diabetic subjects at comparable rates. No increment was observed after hyperglycemia, despite the elevated rates of glucose uptake. It is concluded that (1) hyperglycemia per se stimulates forearm glucose disposal to a greater extent in type II diabetics than in normal subjects; and (2) the resulting increment of glucose disposal does not accelerate the forearm release of three carbon compounds. The data support the hypothesis that hyperglycemia per se may play a compensatory role for the defective glucose disposal in type II diabetes.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 1285
page 1285
icon of scanned page 1286
page 1286
icon of scanned page 1287
page 1287
icon of scanned page 1288
page 1288
icon of scanned page 1289
page 1289
icon of scanned page 1290
page 1290
Version history
  • Version 1 (April 1, 1986): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (41)

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts