To explore possible mechanisms by which complement membrane attack complexes (MAC) that are deposited in the glomerular mesangium might be pathogenic, we stimulated rat glomerular mesangial cells grown in vitro with nascent MACs formed from the purified human complement components C5b6 and normal human serum and measured production of superoxide ion (O2-) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Mesangial cells incubated with C5b6 + serum, which results in cell membrane interaction with the MAC, produce 0.9 +/- 0.15 nmol O2-/10(5) cells per 30 min, which was significantly greater than the amount produced by cells incubated with C5b6 alone, serum alone, or decayed MACs that can no longer interact with the cell membrane (0.3 +/- 0.2, 0.4 +/- 0.1, 0.3 +/- 0.2 nmol O2-/10(5) cells per 30 min, respectively; P less than 0.02). Production of O2- after stimulation with MACs increased during the first 20 min of incubation but then plateaued. Cells exposed to decayed MACs produced small amounts of O2-, which did not increase from 20 to 60 min. Production of H2O2 was also observed after stimulation with MACs, and continued to increase during 60 min of incubation (1.22 +/- 0.16 nmol H2O2/10(5) cells per 60 min), whereas H2O2 production could not be detected after exposure to decayed MACs. Cell viability was not adversely affected by exposure to nascent MACs as determined by trypan blue exclusion or chromium-51 release. These results demonstrate that glomerular mesangial cell membrane interaction with the MAC stimulates the production of the toxic oxygen metabolites O- and H2O2. Activation of the terminal complement pathway by mesangial immune deposits in vivo might lead to tissue injury by stimulation of local production of toxic oxygen-free radicals.
S Adler, P J Baker, R J Johnson, R F Ochi, P Pritzl, W G Couser
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 203 | 8 |
48 | 16 | |
Scanned page | 220 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 60 | 0 |
Totals | 531 | 27 |
Total Views | 558 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.