Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1985;76(6):2254-2258. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI112234.
Abstract
Bone gamma-carboxyglutamic acid-containing (Gla) protein (BGP, osteocalcin) is a noncollagenous protein of bone present in plasma and removed by the kidney. Plasma BGP has been shown to be elevated in patients with certain bone diseases. The present study evaluates serum BGP (S-BGP), serum alkaline phosphatase (S-AP), and urinary hydroxyproline excretion (U-OHP) in diseases with differing bone turnover rates, and compares the accuracy of these measurements for estimating bone mineralization (m) and resorption (r) rates. S-BGP, S-AP, U-OHP, and creatinine clearance (Clcr) were measured in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (n = 13), hyperthyroidism (n = 6), and hypothyroidism (n = 6). Bone mineralization and resorption rates were calculated from a 7-d combined calcium balance and 47Ca turnover study. A highly significant correlation (r = 0.69, P less than 0.001) was found between S-BGP and m. Multiple regression analysis disclosed a partial correlation between S-BGP and m when Clcr was taken into account (r = 0.82, P less than 0.001), and between S-BGP and Clcr when m was taken into account (r = -0.62, P less than 0.005). In accordance with this, a stronger correlation (r = 0.89, P less than 0.0001) was found between S-BGP X Clcr and m than between S-BGP and m. A less significant correlation was found between S-AP and m (r = 0.45, P less than 0.05). Furthermore, U-OHP showed a highly significant positive correlation to r (r = 0.78, P less than 0.001). Thus, in the studied disorders of calcium metabolism, individual serum levels of BGP depend on both mineralization rate and renal function. Serum levels of BGP corrected for alterations in renal function are superior to uncorrected S-BGP and to S-AP levels in the estimation of bone mineralization rates.
Authors
P Charles, J W Poser, L Mosekilde, F T Jensen
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 215 | 0 |
| 117 | 12 | |
| Scanned page | 233 | 1 |
| Citation downloads | 43 | 0 |
| Totals | 608 | 13 |
| Total Views | 621 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2024 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)