Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Mechanism of liver glycogen repletion in vivo by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
G I Shulman, … , R G Shulman, R A DeFronzo
G I Shulman, … , R G Shulman, R A DeFronzo
Published September 1, 1985
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1985;76(3):1229-1236. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI112078.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

Mechanism of liver glycogen repletion in vivo by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

In order to quantitate the pathways by which liver glycogen is repleted, we administered [1-13C]glucose by gavage into awake 24-h fasted rats and examined the labeling pattern of 13C in hepatic glycogen. Two doses of [1-13C]glucose, 1 and 6 mg/g body wt, were given to examine whether differences in the plasma glucose concentration altered the metabolic pathways via which liver glycogen was replenished. After 1 and 3 h (high-dose group) and after 1 and 2 h (low-dose group), the animals were anesthetized and the liver was quickly freeze-clamped. Liver glycogen was extracted and the purified glycogen hydrolyzed to glucose with amyloglucosidase. The distribution of the 13C-label was subsequently determined by 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The percent 13C enrichment of the glucosyl units in glycogen was: 15.1 +/- 0.8%(C-1), 1.5 +/- 0.1%(C-2), 1.2 +/- 0.1%(C-3), 1.1 +/- 0.1%(C-4), 1.6 +/- 0.1%(C-5), and 2.2 +/- 0.1%(C-6) for the high-dose study (n = 4, at 3 h); 16.5 +/- 0.5%(C-1), 2.0 +/- 0.1%(C-2), 1.3 +/- 0.1%(C-3), 1.1 +/- 0.1%(C-4), 2.2 +/- 0.1%(C-5), and 2.4 +/- 0.1%(C-6) in the low-dose study (n = 4, at 2 h). The average 13C-enrichment of C-1 glucose in the portal vein was found to be 43 +/- 1 and 40 +/- 2% in the high- and low-dose groups, respectively. Therefore, the amount of glycogen that was synthesized from the direct pathway (i.e., glucose----glucose-6-phosphate----glucose-1-phosphate----UDP-glucose---- glycogen) was calculated to be 31 and 36% in the high- and low-dose groups, respectively. The 13C-enrichments of portal vein lactate and alanine were 14 and 14%, respectively, in the high-dose group and 11 and 8%, respectively, in the low-dose group. From these enrichments, the minimum contribution of these gluconeogenic precursors to glycogen repletion can be calculated to be 7 and 20% in the high- and low-dose groups, respectively. The maximum contribution of glucose recycling at the triose isomerase step to glycogen synthesis (i.e., glucose----triose-phosphates----glycogen) was estimated to be 3 and 1% in the high- and low-dose groups, respectively. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that (a) only one-third of liver glycogen repletion occurs via the direct conversion of glucose to glycogen, and that (b) only a very small amount of glycogen synthesis can be accounted for by the conversion of glucose to triose phosphates and back to glycogen; this suggests that futile cycling between fructose-6-phosphate and fructose-1,6-diphosphate under these conditions is minimal. Our results also show that (c) alanine and lactate account for a minimum of between 7 and 20% of the glycogen synthesized, and that (d) the three pathways through which the labeled flux is measured account for a total of only 50% of the total glycogen synthesized. These results suggest that either there is a sizeable amount of glycogen synthesis via pathway(s) that were not examined in the present experiment or that there is a much greater dilution of labeled alanine/lactate in the oxaloacetate pool than previously appreciated, or some combination of these two explanations.

Authors

G I Shulman, D L Rothman, D Smith, C M Johnson, J B Blair, R G Shulman, R A DeFronzo

×

Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 232 19
PDF 62 21
Scanned page 273 7
Citation downloads 45 0
Totals 612 47
Total Views 659
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts