To define critical parameters concerning interferon (IFN) effects upon natural killer (NK) cells in vivo, we gave cancer patients serial weekly intramuscular injections of purified lymphoblastoid IFN in six doses ranging from 10(5) to 3 X 10(7) U. Dose sequences were determined by randomly allocating patients to one of six levels in a latin square ordering scheme. NK cell stimulation, a threefold peak increase above preinjection levels of cytolysis (P = 0.022), occurred in peripheral mononuclear cells (PMC) sampled 24 h postinjection, of 3 X 10(6) U, but was not detectable at any dose in PMC sampled 7 d postinjection. No blunting occurred in NK cell responsiveness to repeated injection of IFN dosages a second time at or several weeks after study completion. At IFN doses of 3 X 10(6), 10(7), and 3 X 10(7) U, a negative correlation existed between the amount of IFN injected and the average extent of NK cell activation (r = -0.423, P less than 0.05). This contrasted with the progressively increasing response of NK cells to in vitro incubation with increasing concentration of up to 3,000 U/ml of IFN. Overnight culturing of PMC sampled before IFN injections resulted in a mean 1.9-fold increase in cytolytic activity (P = 0.0005) and a mean 53% decrease in variance (P = 0.024) between serial preinjection NK cell activity determinations. Cell separation procedures may, therefore, have resulted in NK cell inactivation, from which overnight culturing permitted recovery. We found that maximal NK cell activation at a low IFN dose, decreasing NK cell responsiveness at higher doses, and the need to culture PMC to efficiently detect NK cell boosting may account for disparities in reported effects of IFN on NK cell function.
B S Edwards, J A Merritt, R C Fuhlbrigge, E C Borden
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 167 | 7 |
54 | 20 | |
Scanned page | 246 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
Totals | 528 | 28 |
Total Views | 556 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.