It is conventionally considered that because of their fiber orientations, the external intercostal muscles elevate the ribs, whereas the internal interosseous intercostals lower the ribs. The mechanical action of the intercostal muscles, however, has never been studied directly, and the electromyographic observations supporting this conventional thinking must be interpreted with caution. In the present studies, the external and internal interosseous intercostal muscles have been separately stimulated in different interspaces at, above, and below end-expiratory rib cage volume in anesthetized dogs. The axial (cephalo-caudal) displacements of the ribs were measured using linear displacement transducers. The results indicate that when contracting in a single interspace and other muscles are relaxed, both the external and internal intercostals have a net rib elevating action at end-expiratory rib cage volume. This action increases as rib cage volume decreases, but it progressively decreases as rib cage volume increases such that at high rib cage volumes, both the external and internal intercostals lower the ribs. Stimulating the intercostal muscles in three adjacent intercostal spaces simultaneously produced similar directional rib motion results. We conclude that (a) in contrast with the conventional thinking, the external and internal interosseous intercostals acting alone have by and large a similar effect on the ribs into which they insert; (b) this effect is very much dependent on rib cage (lung) volume; and (c) intercostal muscle action is primarily determined by the resistance of the upper ribs to caudad displacement relative to the resistance of the lower ribs to cephalad displacement. The lateral intercostals, however, might be more involved in postural movements than in respiration. Their primary involvement in rotations of the trunk might account for the presence of two differently oriented muscle layers between the ribs.
A De Troyer, S Kelly, P T Macklem, W A Zin
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 403 | 118 |
108 | 122 | |
Scanned page | 409 | 98 |
Citation downloads | 51 | 0 |
Totals | 971 | 338 |
Total Views | 1,309 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.