Although functional abnormalities of the sickle erythrocyte membrane skeleton have been described, there is little quantitative data on the function of the proteins that compose the skeleton. We have examined the association of spectrin, the major skeletal protein, with ankyrin, its high-affinity membrane binding site, and found sickle erythrocytes to have markedly reduced binding. Binding is assayed by incubation of purified 125I-spectrin with spectrin-depleted inside-out vesicles (IOVs) and measurement of the label bound to IOVs. Sickle IOVs bind approximately 50% less ankyrin than do controls IOVs (P less than 0.001). Control experiments show that this reduced binding is not a function of faulty composition or orientation of sickle IOVs, or of reticulocytosis per se. Our least symptomatic patient has the highest binding capacity, suggesting that this abnormality may be related to clinical severity. This trend is supported by experiments showing that asymptomatic subjects with sickle trait, sickle cell anemia and high fetal hemoglobin, and sickle beta +-thalassemia have normal binding, whereas a symptomatic patient with sickle beta zero-thalassemia has abnormal binding. In contrast to what we see with ankyrin in situ on the IOV, when isolated and studied in solution, sickle ankyrin binds normally to spectrin. This discrepancy may be related to preferential purification of the normal ankyrin species or to an abnormal topography of the membrane near the spectrin attachment site. We hypothesize that sickle hemoglobin or perhaps the metabolic consequences of sickling damage the protein skeleton. This damage may alter the surface of the erythrocyte and result in abnormal cell-cell interactions which may be related to clinical severity.
O S Platt, J F Falcone, S E Lux
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 137 | 1 |
46 | 23 | |
Figure | 0 | 3 |
Scanned page | 190 | 8 |
Citation downloads | 51 | 0 |
Totals | 424 | 35 |
Total Views | 459 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.