Studies were performed on a French-Canadian family afflicted with a bleeding disorder exhibiting an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern and a severe bleeding diathesis after trauma. Clinical laboratory coagulation tests were unimpressive; the only persistent abnormalities include mild thrombocytopenia and moderately reduced Factor V clotting activities. Some individuals had prolonged Stypven times when platelet-rich plasma was used, suggesting that their platelets could not support functional prothrombinase complex assembly. Detailed studies were performed by use of plasma and isolated, washed platelets from a sister and brother. Bioassay data indicate that both individuals had Factor V activities of approximately 40 and 36% of normal, respectively. A comparison of the Factor V radioimmunoassay and bioassay data on the brother's plasma indicated that the circulating amount of Factor V functional activity was low relative to Factor V antigen concentration (approximately 65-75%). In both individuals, the platelet Factor V functional activities were extremely low (2-4%) relative to antigen levels present as determined by radioimmunoassay. These discrepancies between Factor V activities and antigen concentration do not appear to be due to an unstable Factor V molecule or to the presence of a Factor V or Factor Va inhibitor or inactivator. Kinetics of prothrombin activation by use of purified clotting factors indicated that thrombin-activated platelets from both individuals supported prothrombinase complex assembly identical to controls in the presence of added purified Factor Va. Consequently, their bleeding diathesis appears to reflect their platelet, rather than their plasma, Factor V activity. These results suggest that platelet Factor V is an essential component in maintaining stable and prolonged hemostasis after trauma.
P B Tracy, A R Giles, K G Mann, L L Eide, H Hoogendoorn, G E Rivard
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 228 | 6 |
57 | 30 | |
Scanned page | 261 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 55 | 0 |
Totals | 601 | 40 |
Total Views | 641 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.