The hypothesis that an immune response is directed to components of brain tissue in Huntington's disease (HD) was examined. 27 patients with HD, 21 children of affected parents who showed no signs of disease, 6 spouses of HD patients, and 40 patients with other neurologic diseases were investigated. Leukocyte migration inhibition to antigens prepared from brain tissue was demonstrated in 26 HD patients and in 9 children. None of the six spouses reacted. 13 patients with other neurologic conditions (including 60% of patients after cerebrovascular accidents) reacted to rat brain extract. Fractionation of brain tissue indicated that the material responsible for reactions in these patients differed from that in HD. The material that elicited hypersensitivity in HD was not species specific, since it was found in rat, calf, human, and rabbit brain. It was not present in rat kidney, liver, or heart. Preliminary characterization showed that the material was protein in nature, contained sugar and lipid, and was heat labile. The finding of hypersensitivity in about half the unaffected children of HD parents suggests that it may precede the clinical onset of disease and serve as a marker for the gene.
R S Walls, A Ruwoldt
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 86 | 4 |
34 | 8 | |
Scanned page | 242 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 48 | 0 |
Totals | 410 | 13 |
Total Views | 423 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.