The circumstantial evidence that indicates that glucocorticoids (GC) may stimulate osteoclastic resorption in vivo has recently found support in observations that demonstrate that these compounds effectively increase the activity of isolated resorptive cells (osteoclasts, macrophage polykaryons, and elicited macrophages [MO] ) in vitro. Data are presented here that indicate that this stimulation by GC is due to an enhancement of the initial stage of the resorption process, the attachment of cells to bone, and that this is caused by alterations of cell surface oligosaccharides. Specifically, dexamethasone and cortisol enhance by 80% the attachment of MO to bone surfaces in a dose dependent manner but do not alter or reduce the binding of these cells to other surfaces (plastic, collagen, and hydroxyapatite crystals). The effect of GC on cell-bone attachment is blocked by the glycosylation inhibitor, tunicamycin, and the glycosylation modifier, swainsonine; this demonstrates that asparagine-linked oligosaccharides are involved in the stimulatory process. Flow cytometric analysis of GC-treated cells using a panel of fluoresceinated lectins confirms this by indicating a selective, enhanced exposure of plasma membrane-associated N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylgalactosamine residues, sugars we have previously shown to be pivotal in MO-bone binding. Finally, progesterone, a known GC antagonist, blocks GC-stimulated resorption, macrophage-bone binding, and membrane oligosaccharide modification, presumably by competing for the GC receptor. Progesterone alone alters none of these processes. Thus, GC stimulates the resorptive activity of macrophages by enhancing the initial events in the degradative process (cell-bone binding) and does so, apparently, via receptor-mediator alteration of cell surface glycoproteins.
Z Bar-Shavit, A J Kahn, L E Pegg, K R Stone, S L Teitelbaum
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 103 | 2 |
36 | 23 | |
Figure | 0 | 1 |
Scanned page | 198 | 6 |
Citation downloads | 42 | 0 |
Totals | 379 | 32 |
Total Views | 411 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.