Studies were performed in anesthetized opossums to investigate the influence of successive vagal stimuli on esophageal contractions. Mechanical activity was recorded manometrically 5 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter. Contractions in the esophagus were evoked by electrical stimuli of 2.5 mA, and 1-ms pulse duration applied to the cervical vagi, at various train durations and frequencies. Paired or multiple stimuli of 1-s train length were also tested at different interstimulus intervals (ISI). Paired stimuli at an ISI of less than or equal to 3 s and at a frequency of less than or equal to 10 Hz showed refractoriness, i.e., the contractions to the first stimulus inhibited the contraction to the second stimulus. A frequency of 50 Hz showed initial inhibition, i.e., the second stimulus inhibited the contraction to the first stimulus. Repetitive stimuli applied at a rate of 8/min (ISI 6.5 s) evoked contractions to each stimulus. At 15/min, every second or third contraction was inhibited. With stimuli applied at 30/min, contractions occurred only in response to the first and/or the last stimulus; depending upon the frequency of vagal stimulation. The intervening stimuli did not evoke any contractions. A long train stimulus produced an initial, a terminal, or both contractions depending on the stimulation value. These studies show that (a) vagal efferent stimulation causes initial inhibition and refractoriness in the esophageal smooth muscle; (b) the degree of initial inhibition increases with increasing frequency of stimulation; (c) the occurrence of contractions only at the onset and the end of a long train stimulus may be due to the influence of initial inhibition and refractoriness.
J S Gidda, R K Goyal
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 160 | 0 |
107 | 24 | |
Scanned page | 372 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 43 | 0 |
Totals | 682 | 25 |
Total Views | 707 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.