We have studied the influence of verapamil hydrochloride on the in vitro and in vivo effects of daunorubicin in Ehrlich ascites carcinoma. Daunorubicin-sensitive tumor was rendered resistant to daunorubicin by the continuous treatment of sequential generations of tumor-bearing BALB/c mice. The ability of daunorubicin to inhibit [3H]uridine and [3H]thymidine incorporation and the effect of daunorubicin on the mean survival time of host animals bearing daunorubicin-sensitive and daunorubicin-resistant Ehrlich ascites carcinoma were compared. The addition of verapamil to daunorubicin in vitro reduced the concentration of daunorubicin required to inhibit 50% of DNA and RNA synthesis in the daunorubicin-resistant tumor to that required in the daunorubicin-sensitive tumor, from 6 and 4.4 μg/ml to 1.5 and 1.3 μg/ml, respectively. Verapamil also restored drug sensitivity to daunorubicin-resistant Ehrlich ascites carcinoma in vivo. The 21.7±0.7 d mean survival time (MST) of BALB/c mice bearing daunorubicin-resistant tumor treated with daunorubicin alone rose to 44.0±0.7 d when the same tumor was treated with verapamil and daunorubicin, P < 0.001. This in vivo effect is specific for daunorubicin-resistant Ehrlich ascites carcinoma, since there is no alteration in MST of BALB/c mice bearing daunorubicin-sensitive or daunorubicin-resistant tumor when they are treated with verapamil alone or when BALB/c mice bearing daunorubicin-sensitive tumor are treated with daunorubicin and verapamil.
Lewis M. Slater, Sandra L. Murray, Martha W. Wetzel, Ronald M. Wisdom, Emily M. Duvall
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 99 | 0 |
33 | 14 | |
Scanned page | 144 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 49 | 0 |
Totals | 325 | 15 |
Total Views | 340 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.