The intracellular distribution of glutathione into kinetically distinct pools and the determinants of glutathione turnover were examined in vivo. Glutathione turnover was measured in individual, restrained rats with a biliary fistula by administration of acetaminophen to trap the previously labeled hepatic glutathione as an excretable acetaminophen adduct. Fasting for 48 h resulted in a decrease of hepatic glutathione from 4.7±0.9 to 3.6±0.8 μmol/g liver and a marked increase in the fractional rate of glutathione turnover from 0.19±0.04 to 0.43±0.07/h. Within 6 h following refeeding, the rate of glutathione turnover and the hepatic glutathione concentration returned to normal. The simultaneously determined specific activities of free intrahepatic glutathione and the acetaminophen-glutathione adduct in bile were identical, indicating that the hepatic glutathione pool is kinetically homogeneous. The synthesis of glutathione could, therefore, be estimated from the rate constant and the intrahepatic glutathione concentration. During fasting hepatic synthesis of glutathione increased from 0.86±0.17 to 1.50±0.23 μmol/g per h. In fed animals the administration of dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate and theophylline stimulated the rate of hepatic glutathione turnover similar to fasting. In contrast, glucose given intraduodenally to fasted animals decreased the rate of glutathione turnover. These data are consistent with the view that the increased glutathione turnover that occurs during fasting results from two mechanisms. Because of a decrease in the intrahepatic free glutathione/mixed disulfide ratio, which is apparently mediated by cyclic adenosine monophosphate, the free glutathione pool contracts and turns over more rapidly in order to maintain glutathione synthesis. In addition, glutathione consumption via the gamma-glutamyl cycle apparently is increased, which may be related to the increased uptake of amino acids for gluconeogenesis during fasting.
Bernhard H. Lauterburg, Jerry R. Mitchell
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 97 | 0 |
54 | 18 | |
Scanned page | 294 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 48 | 0 |
Totals | 493 | 22 |
Total Views | 515 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.