The vascular effects of arginine vasopressin (AVP) were examined in conscious Sprague-Dawley rats. In six control rats, synthetic AVP at a dose of 40 ng/kg, injected as an intravenous bolus, resulted in a rise in mean arterial blood pressure (BP) from 127 to 149 mm Hg (P < 0.005). No tachyphylaxis was observed after a second AVP bolus administered 30 min later, as BP increased from 125 to 150 mm Hg, P < 0.005. In a second group of six rats, 1-deamino penicillamine, 2-(O-methyl) tyrosine AVP ([dPTyr (Me)]AVP), was administered intravenously at a dose of 10 μg/kg, just before the second AVP bolus. In this group of studies BP rose from 124 to 150 mm Hg (P < 0.01) after the first AVP bolus, but not after the second AVP bolus, which was administered after [dPTyr (Me)]AVP (129 vs. 129 mm Hg, NS). To assess the effect of this AVP pressor antagonist on BP in rats with suppressed endogenous vasopressin, six water-diuresing rats (mean urinary osmolality, 99 mosmol/kg H2O) were administered the analogue at the same dose as the first group of rats. The analogue exerted no demonstrable effect on mean BP (128 before vs. 129 mm Hg after [dPTyr (Me)]AVP, NS). In these rats, mean radioimmunoassayable levels of AVP were at or below the detectable limits of our assay (0.5 pg/ml). In contrast, six rats in which endogenous AVP was stimulated by fluid deprivation for 24 h (mean urinary osmolality, 2,489 mosmol/kg H2O and mean AVP level of 21.6 pg/ml) had a marked fall in BP when administered the AVP analogue. In these animals [dPTyr (Me)]AVP caused a fall in BP from 124 to 110 mm Hg (P < 0.005). This fall in blood pressure was due to a fall in peripheral vascular resistance (0.35 vs. 0.30 mm Hg/ml per min per kg, P < 0.02) after [dPTyr (Me)]AVP, as cardiac index remained unchanged.
Gary A. Aisenbrey, William A. Handelman, Patricia Arnold, Maurice Manning, Robert W. Schrier
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 214 | 2 |
52 | 30 | |
Scanned page | 245 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 46 | 0 |
Totals | 557 | 35 |
Total Views | 592 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.