Vascular refractoriness to the systemic pressor effects of angiotension II (AII) develops normally during human pregnancy. To ascertain if the ewe might provide a suitable animal model to study the mechanisms responsible for this response (unique to pregnancy) we studied this phenomenon in unanesthetized, chronically instrumented nonpregnant and pregnant sheep, 68-143 d gestation. In these studies dose-response curves were established for changes in both mean arterial pressure and uterine blood flow. The pressor response to continuous infusions of AII increases as a function of the dose of AII in both nonpregnant and pregnant animals (P less than 0.001), R = 0.943 and 0.879, respectively. However, the pregnant animals were refractory to the pressor effects of AII, requiring 0.016 microgram of AII/min per kg to elicit a 20 mm HG rise in mean arterial pressure, in contrast to 0.009 for nonpregnant animals. The slope and intercept for the regression lines are different at P less than 0.001. In pregnant animals the dose-response curve for uterine blood flow was also determined. Increases in uterine blood flow were observed at doses of AII less than 0.016 microgram/min per kg, while larger doses resulted in a progressively greater reduction in blood flow. It appears likely that the ewe may serve as an animal model suitable for the further study of the unique pregnancy-modified systemic and uteroplacental vascular responses elicited by AII.
C R Rosenfeld, N F Gant Jr
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 91 | 0 |
31 | 15 | |
Scanned page | 186 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 47 | 0 |
Totals | 355 | 16 |
Total Views | 371 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.