Patients with coronary vasospasm appear to be supersensitive to the coronary constrictor effects of ergonovine. To determine whether atherosclerosis alters arterial reactivity and sensitizes arteries to ergonovine, contractile responses of isolated aortae from control rabbits and from rabbits fed a high-cholesterol diet were compared. Aortic strips were mounted in a myograph for the monitoring of isometric tension, equilibrated in oxygenated Krebs buffer, and exposed to graded concentrations of agonists and antagonists. The concentration-response relation for ergonovine in atherosclerotic arteries exhibited a markedly depressed constrictor threshold concentration (0.5 pM vs. 0.23 μM in controls), a significantly lowered one-half effective dose (ED50) value, and an augmented maximal response. Furthermore, atherosclerotic arteries showed similar, although less pronounced changes in the concentration-response relation for serotonin. In contrast, responses to 34 mM KCl were virtually identical, and the concentration-response relation for phenylephrine were similar in the two groups. In control arteries, 0.1 μM phentolamine and 0.1 μM prazosin suppressed responses to 1 μM ergonovine by 71 and 90%, respectively. However, in atherosclerotic arteries α-blockers in the same concentration inhibited responses to 0.01 μM ergonovine by less than 10%. On the other hand, 0.1 μM cyproheptadine, a serotonergic antagonist, suppressed these responses by 82%. Thus, the supersensitivity to ergonovine appeared to be mediated predominantly by a serotonergic mechanism. These results indicate that smooth muscle in atherosclerotic arteries may be supersensitive to specific vasoconstricting stimuli, a change that might contribute to arterial dysfunction in vivo.
Philip D. Henry, Mitsuhiro Yokoyama
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 165 | 1 |
81 | 26 | |
Scanned page | 250 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 40 | 0 |
Totals | 536 | 31 |
Total Views | 567 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.