Advertisement
Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI109814
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Department of Physiology, and Cardiovascular Center, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Find articles by Walker, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Department of Physiology, and Cardiovascular Center, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Find articles by Abboud, F. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Department of Physiology, and Cardiovascular Center, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Find articles by Mark, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Department of Physiology, and Cardiovascular Center, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
Find articles by Thames, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published June 1, 1980 - More info
Activation of cardiopulmonary receptors with vagal afferents results predominantly in reflex inhibition of efferent sympathetic activity, whereas activation of somatic receptors reflexly increases sympathetic activity to the heart and circulation. Previous studies in experimental animals indicate that there is an important interaction between these excitatory and inhibitory reflexes in the control of the renal circulation.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a similar interaction between somatic and cardiopulmonary reflexes in humans. The activity of the cardiopulmonary receptors was altered (reduced) with lower body negative pressure (−5 mm Hg), which causes a decrease in cardiac filling pressure and a small reflex increase in forearm vascular resistance without accompanying changes in arterial pressure. Activation of somatic receptors by isometric handgrip for 2 min at 10 and 20% of maximum voluntary contraction resulted in reflex vasoconstriction in the nonexercising arm. Lower body negative pressure at −5 mm Hg produced a threefold augmentation in the forearm vasoconstrictor response to isometric handgrip in the nonexercising arm. This increase in resistance was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the algebraic sum of the increases in resistance resulting from lower body suction alone plus isometric handgrip alone. Furthermore, it occurred despite a greater rise in arterial pressure, which would be expected to decrease forearm vascular resistance through activation of arterial baroreceptors and through passive dilatation of forearm vessels. Thus, removal of the inhibitory influence of cardiopulmonary receptors by pooling blood in the lower extremities enhances the somatic reflex. These data suggest an interaction between cardiopulmonary and somatic reflexes in the control of forearm vascular resistance in man.