Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (65)

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI109607

Effects of Neomycin Alone and in Combination with Cholestyramine on Serum Cholesterol and Fecal Steroids in Hypercholesterolemic Subjects

Tatu A. Miettinen

Second Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00290 Helsinki 29, Finland

Find articles by Miettinen, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published November 1, 1979 - More info

Published in Volume 64, Issue 5 on November 1, 1979
J Clin Invest. 1979;64(5):1485–1493. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI109607.
© 1979 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published November 1, 1979 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Effects of neomycin were studied on serum cholesterol and fecal steroids in hypercholesterolemic patients during a short treatment period (4 wk) and a long treatment period (16 mo), using small (1.5 g/d) and large (up to 6 g/d) doses alone and in combination with cholestyramine. In the short-term low-dose study the decrease in serum cholesterol by 21% was associated with a proportionate increase in fecal cholesterol elimination as neutral sterols through impaired cholesterol absorption. Serum cholesterol remained low and fecal steroid excretion remained elevated in the long-term neomycin study. Increasing the dosage from 1.5 to 6 g/d at the end of the 16-mo period brought about a further slight decrease in serum cholesterol and a small further increase in fecal neutral and acidic steroids. The increases in fecal bile acids and fat but not in neutral sterols were positively correlated with the increases in the neomycin dosage. Thus, large neomycin doses can also cause bile acid malabsorption. In another series of patients, a decrease (25%) in serum cholesterol by cholestyramine was associated with a proportional increase in the fecal elimination of cholesterol (2.5-fold) as bile acids. The inclusion of neomycin in cholestyramine therapy further increased fecal steroid output (solely as neutral sterols) by only about one-fifth of that due to cholestyramine, but further decreased serum cholesterol almost to the same extent (-17%) as cholestyramine alone. The overall decrease was 38%, no side effects occurred, and the patients found combination therapy convenient. Neomycin decreased serum cholesterol in different studies by 10±2, 17±4, and 12±4% per 100 mg/d of the increment in fecal steroids, the respective decrease for cholestyramine being only 2.2±0.5%. Thus, neomycin effectively reduced serum cholesterol by a relatively small increase in cholesterol elimination (via cholesterol malabsorption) compared with cholestyramine-induced bile acid malabsorption.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 1485
page 1485
icon of scanned page 1486
page 1486
icon of scanned page 1487
page 1487
icon of scanned page 1488
page 1488
icon of scanned page 1489
page 1489
icon of scanned page 1490
page 1490
icon of scanned page 1491
page 1491
icon of scanned page 1492
page 1492
icon of scanned page 1493
page 1493
Version history
  • Version 1 (November 1, 1979): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (65)

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts