The natriuresis and concomitant decline in absolute proximal reabsorption (APR) that occur in rats in response to saline loading are blunted markedly when renal perfusion pressure is reduced immediately before, but not after, the volume load. To ascertain the mechanism responsible for these differences between early clamp (EC) vs. late clamp (LC), intracapillary and interstitial determinants of peritubular capillary uptake of APR were measured in seven LC and seven EC Munich-Wistar rats before and after isotonic saline loading (80% body wt). With volume expansion in LC animals, we observed a marked decline in APR (averaging 11±1 nl/min), associated with large increases in urinary sodium excretion rate, which averaged 8±2 μeq/min. In EC, the changes in urinary sodium excretion rate (+1±0 μeq/min) and APR (−3±1 nl/min) with volume expansion were smaller in magnitude. Since peritubular capillary reabsorption coefficient and mean peritubular transcapillary hydraulic pressure difference did not change with saline loading in LC, the marked fall in APR was attributed primarily to a measured large decline in mean peritubular transcapillary oncotic pressure difference (δ̄π̄). Despite an equivalent mean fall in δ̄π̄ with volume expansion in EC, near-constancy of APR was found to be associated with a simultaneous and equivalent decline in mean peritubular transcapillary hydraulic pressure difference (a consequence of decreased mean peritubular capillary hydraulic pressure), which effectively offset the fall in δ̄π̄. These results demonstrate the importance of hydraulic pressure patterns of the peritubular capillaries in modulating APR and are consistent with the view that Starling forces across the postglomerular microcirculation play a fundamental role in determining APR.
Iekuni Ichikawa, Barry M. Brenner
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 106 | 0 |
67 | 14 | |
Scanned page | 373 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 82 | 0 |
Totals | 628 | 18 |
Total Views | 646 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.