Radioiodinated leukocyte elastase was found to bind rapidly and specifically to alveolar macrophages in vitro. In contrast to the binding of pancreatic and bacterial proteases, leukocyte elastase binding did not require the presence of alpha 2 macroglobulin. The binding was inhibited by an excess of unlabeled enzyme and was saturable by increasing elastase concentrations. Leukocyte elastase binding thus met criteria for receptor-mediated binding, with and estimated association constant of 4.97 x 10(5) M-1 and an estimated total of 640 x 10(6) binding sites/cell. It differed from the previously described binding of lysosomal glycosidases to macrophages in that it was insensitive to trypsin pretreatment, did not require calcium ions, and was not inhibited by yeast mannan. High-resolution autoradiography indicated that the cell-associated radiolabeled leukocyte elastase was rapidly incorporated into phagolysosomes. Macrophage binding may have a role in clearance of leukocyte elastase from tissue sites where alpha 2 macroglobulin is absent or present in low concentration. Thus, enzyme uptake by alveolar macrophages may be an important factor in the amelioration of lung tissue injury by extracellular leukocyte elastase.
E J Campbell, R R White, R M Senior, R J Rodriguez, C Kuhn
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 158 | 5 |
47 | 18 | |
Scanned page | 257 | 5 |
Citation downloads | 38 | 0 |
Totals | 500 | 28 |
Total Views | 528 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.