This study was designed to investigate the possible role of dopaminergic mechanisms in the control of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in normal man. Six normal male subjects in metabolic balance at 150 meq sodium, 60 meq potassium constant intake received the specific dopamine antagonist, metoclopramide, 10 mg i.v. or placebo followed by angiotensin II infusion 1 h later on 2 consecutive days. Metoclopramide increased plasma aldosterone concentration from 8.2±2.2 to 21.0±3.3 ng/100 ml (P < 0.005) and plasma prolactin concentration from 18.0±4.0 to 91.7±4.0 ng/ml (P < 0.001) within 15 min of its administration. At 1 h, plasma aldosterone and prolactin concentrations remained elevated at 16.8±2.1 ng/100 ml (P < 0.01) and 86.8±15.9 ng/ml (P < 0.005), respectively. Angiotensin II at 2, 4, and 6 pmol/kg per min further increased plasma aldosterone concentration to 27.2±3.4, 31.9±5.7, and 36.0±6.7 ng/100 ml (P < 0.02), respectively. Placebo did not alter plasma aldosterone or prolactin concentrations, but angiotensin II increased plasma aldosterone concentration to 13.7±2.4, 19.0±1.9, and 23.3±3.2 ng/100 ml (P < 0.005). The increment of plasma aldosterone concentration in response to angiotensin II was similar after metoclopramide or placebo.
Robert M. Carey, Michael O. Thorner, Elizabeth M. Ortt
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 108 | 7 |
36 | 14 | |
Scanned page | 282 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 42 | 0 |
Totals | 468 | 25 |
Total Views | 493 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.