The effects of endogenous and exogenous hyperglucagonemia on the specific binding of glucagon to hepatocyte receptors was studied, as was the response of cAMP to glucagon. In streptozotocin diabetic rats, blood glucose and plasma glucagon increased and plasma insulin decreased as compared with controls. Insulin treatment in diabetic rats restored blood glucose and plasma glucagon toward normal and elevated plasma insulin. Specific binding of 125I-glucagon to isolated hepatocytes (106 cells) decreased in diabetic rats (8.17±0.38%) compared to controls (14.05±0.87%) and was restored by insulin treatment (12.25±0.93%). Specific binding of 125I-insulin in controls was 7.30±10.16%; it increased in diabetic rats to 12.50±0.86%, and decreased in diabetic rats after insulin treatment (9.08±0.87%). Scatchard analysis and the competition plots of the data indicate that decreased glucagon binding and increased insulin binding in diabetes were due to change in the number of receptors rather than a change in their affinity. Hepatocyte cAMP response to glucagon (0.25-5.0 ng/ml) was almost abolished in diabetic rats and was restored with insulin treatment.
Sam J. Bhathena, Nancy R. Voyles, Stewart Smith, Lillian Recant
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 107 | 0 |
48 | 16 | |
Scanned page | 294 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
Totals | 494 | 17 |
Total Views | 511 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.