This study was designed to compare the effect of [des-Aspartyl1]-angiotensin II ([des-Asp]-A II) and angiotensin II (A II) on blood pressure and aldosterone production in man under conditions of normal and low sodium (Na) intake. Seven normal male subjects in balance on constant normal Na intake (UNa V 160.3±5.0 meq/24 h) for 5 days received A II and [des-Asp]-A II infusions on two consecutive days; 1 mo later they were restudied after 5 days of low Na intake (UNa V 10.5±1.6 meq/24 h). Each dose was infused for 30 min, sequentially. During normal Na intake, [des-Asp]-A II from 2 to 18 pmol/kg per min increased mean blood pressure from 85.2±3 to 95.3±5 mm Hg and plasma aldosterone concentration from 5.2±1.1 to 14.3±1.9 ng/100 ml. During low Na intake, the same dose of [des-Asp]-A II increased mean blood pressure from 83.7±3 to 86.7±3 mm Hg and plasma aldosterone concentration from 34.4±6.0 to 51.0±8.2 ng/100 ml. In contrast, A II from 2 to 6 pmol/kg per min during normal Na intake increased mean blood pressure from 83.3±4 to 102.3±4 mm Hg and plasma aldosterone concentration from 7.0±2.2 to 26.8±2.0 ng/100 ml; during low Na intake, A II increased mean blood pressure from 83.0±3 to 96.0±4 mm Hg and plasma aldosterone concentration from 42.0±9.7 to 102.2±15.4 ng/100 ml. A II and [des-Asp]-A II were equally effective in suppressing renin release. Plasma cortisol and Na and K concentration did not change.
Robert M. Carey, E. Darracott Vaughan Jr., Michael J. Peach, Carlos R. Ayers
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 97 | 2 |
51 | 22 | |
Scanned page | 442 | 7 |
Citation downloads | 51 | 0 |
Totals | 641 | 31 |
Total Views | 672 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.