Usage Information

Effects of Autoantibodies to the Insulin Receptor on Isolated Adipocytes: STUDIES OF INSULIN BINDING AND INSULIN ACTION
C. Ronald Kahn, … , Jeffrey S. Flier, David B. Jarrett
C. Ronald Kahn, … , Jeffrey S. Flier, David B. Jarrett
Published November 1, 1977
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1977;60(5):1094-1106. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI108861.
View: Text | PDF

Effects of Autoantibodies to the Insulin Receptor on Isolated Adipocytes: STUDIES OF INSULIN BINDING AND INSULIN ACTION

Abstract

Autoantibodies to the insulin receptor have been detected in the sera of several patients with the Type B syndrome of insulin resistance and acanthosis nigricans. In this study we have used three of these sera (B-1, B-2, and B-3) as probes of the insulin receptor in isolated rat adipocytes. Preincubation of adipocytes with each of the three sera resulted in an inhibition of subsequent [125I]insulin binding. 50% inhibition of binding occurred with serum dilutions of 1:5 to 1:7,500. As in our previous studies with other tissues, Scatchard analysis of the insulin-binding data was curvilinear consistent with negative cooperativity. Computer analysis suggested that in each case the inhibition of binding was due to a decrease in receptor affinity rather than a change in available receptor number.

Authors

C. Ronald Kahn, Kathleen Baird, Jeffrey S. Flier, David B. Jarrett

×

Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 165 0
PDF 108 36
Scanned page 455 48
Citation downloads 39 0
Totals 767 84
Total Views 851
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement