To test the possibility that a functionally abnormal fibrinogen may exist in some patients with liver disease, we studied the plasma and purified fibrinogens of five patients whose plasma thrombin times were prolonged at least 40% over normal controls. In no patient was there evidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation and/or fibrinolysis. No abnormalities were detected by immunoelectrophoresis of plasmas or purified fibrinogens. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of reduced patient fibrinogens showed normal mobility and amount of Aα, Bβ, and γ chains. Alkaline polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and gradient elution, DEAE-cellulose chromatography of admixtures of radio-iodinated patient 125I-fibrinogen and normal 131I-fibrinogen showed identical mobility in the gel and simultaneous elution from the column, respectively. Thrombin and Reptilase (Abbott Scientific Products Div., Abbott Laboratories, South Pasadena, Calif.) times of purified patient fibrinogens were prolonged, and calcium ions improved but did not completely correct these defects. Increasing amounts of thrombin progressively shortened the clotting times of patient fibrinogens but not to the level of normal. Addition of equal amounts of patient fibrinogen to normal fibrinogen resulted in a prolongation of the thrombin time of the normal protein. Thrombin-induced fibrinopeptide release was normal. Fibrin monomers prepared from patient plasmas and purified fibrinogens demonstrated impaired aggregation at low (0.12) and high (0.24) ionic strength. These studies demonstrate that some patients with liver disease and prolonged plasma thrombin times have a dysfibrinogenemia functionally characterized by an abnormality of fibrin monomer polymerization.
Joseph E. Palascak, Jose Martinez
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 138 | 3 |
47 | 32 | |
Scanned page | 206 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 39 | 0 |
Totals | 430 | 37 |
Total Views | 467 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.