Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1977;59(6):1143-1150. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI108738.
Abstract
Basal and hormone-stimulated prostaglandin biosynthesis was compared in isolated perfused rabbit kidneys with and without ureteral obstruction. At 72 h there was enhanced responsiveness to bradykinin in the ureter-obstructed hydronephrotic kidney. The amount of prostaglandin-like substance released from the perfused kidneys by 25 ng of bradykinin was 533+/-163 ng from the ureter-obstructed, 28+/-4 ng from the contralateral, and 26+/-3 ng from the normal kidney. The enhanced response was also noted with angiotensin II and with norepinephrine. This exaggerated responsiveness by the ureter-obstructed kidney could not be explained by decreased prostaglandin (PG) destruction or by decreased renal peptide inactivation (bradykinin or angiotensin). There was no enhanced PG biosynthesis with exogenous arachidonate, suggesting there was no increase in cyclo-oxygenase activity in the ureter-obstructed kidney. Renal tubular transport of PG from medulla to cortex was apparently not essential for the enhanced PG biosynthesis to hormone stimulation since the same exaggerated responses were noted during perfusion with the ureter ligated. The cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin, increased basal perfusion pressure in the obstructed kidney and enhanced the magnitude and duration of the renal vasoconstriction produced by angiotensin II in the hydronephrotic kidney. These results suggest that the local exaggerated biosynthesis of PG may be occurring in the cortical resistance vessels and may be important to the alteration in blood flow and excretory function that occur in ureteral obstruction.
Authors
K Nishikawa, A Morrison, P Needleman
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 129 | 3 |
| 63 | 16 | |
| Scanned page | 268 | 10 |
| Citation downloads | 57 | 0 |
| Totals | 517 | 29 |
| Total Views | 546 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)