A rabbit model was developed to study the in vivo viability of neutrophils stored in vitro for up to 72 h. Acid-citrate-dextrose anticoagulated whole blood was obtained from rabbits previously injected with tritiated thymidine ([3H]thymidine), stored under varying conditions, and then injected into recipient rabbits. Neutrophil viability and function were assessed by measuring the ability of the tagged neutrophils to circulate and to migrate into subcutaneous polyvinyl sponges. Unstored neutrophils disappeared exponentially from the circulation with a t1/2 of 3.2 h and gave a zero time recovery of 30.5%. Storage of cells at either room temperature or 4 degrees C for 24 h or longer resulted in temporary sequestration of cells from active circulation. With cells stored for up to 72 h at 4 degrees C, recovery returned to normal values after 1-2 h. Room temperature stored cells, in contrast, showed evidence of irreversible damage at 48-h storage with low recovery for the entire time span studied. With unstored blood, 8.1+/-0.9% of the injected neutrophil label was present in the subcutaneous sponges. The accumulated label progressively decreased as cell storage time increased reaching at 72 h 5.1+/-0.6 and 2.6+/-0.3% for 4 degrees C and room temperature-stored cells, respectively. The results of this study indicate that 4 degrees C storage of rabbit neutrophils is superior to storage at room temperature. The data suggest that it may be feasible to store neutrophils at least a few days without loss of in vivo functions.
T H Price, D C Dale
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 171 | 37 |
45 | 10 | |
Scanned page | 229 | 7 |
Citation downloads | 62 | 0 |
Totals | 507 | 54 |
Total Views | 561 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.