An enzyme immunoassay for human beta-glucuronidase was developed to determine the presence or absence of antigenically cross-reactive material (CRM) in patients with beta-glucuronidase deficiency mucopolysaccharidosis. This assay provided a sensitive means of measuring the primary interaction between the enzyme molecule and antibody but required neither pure antigen nor monospecific antiserum, an important consideration, since neither of these was available. Goat antiserum to partially purified human placenta beta-glucuronidase did not recognize differences in normal enzyme from human placenta, liver, fibroblasts, or blood platelets. CRM was identified in fibroblast extracts from all four of the unrelated beta-glucuronidase-deficient patients studied, but titration patterns indicated genetic heterogeneity among these four mutant proteins. Fibroblast enzymes from two obligate heterozygotes were distinguishable immunologically from normal enzyme. The enzyme immunoassay was also used to compare human enzyme with liver enzyme from other mammalian species. CRM was present in liver extracts of all species tested, but the liver enzymes, except for the rabbit, were weakly cross-reactive. We conclude that despite certain limitations, the enzyme immunoassay for human beta-glucuronidase is useful and that all four beta-glucuronidase-deficient patients studied possess CRM.
C E Bell Jr, W S Sly, F E Brot
Usage data is cumulative from March 2024 through March 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 123 | 6 |
47 | 26 | |
Scanned page | 333 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 57 | 0 |
Totals | 560 | 35 |
Total Views | 595 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.