D-Penicillamine, a reducing and chelating agent used in the treating of rheumatoid arthritis, was tested for its effects of polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemotaxis, phagocytosis, and lysosomal enzymes. beta-Glucuronidase release from polymorphonuclear leukocytes after phagocytosis of latex particles was not affected by D-penicillamine at concentrations ranging from 25 to 400 mg/liter. No direct effect was seen on enzyme activity at the maximum concentration of the drug. There was no inhibition of latex particle ingestion. No cell damage was found at 400 mg/liter penicillamine as measured by lactic dehydrogenase release. At this drug concentration there was only a 15% reduction in hemolytic complement levels. Chemotaxis was significantly decreased at concentrations of 50 mg/liter with a dose-dependent effect at higher concentrations which showed a plateau from 200 to 400 mg/liter. The parent compound D-cysteine was also tested in these systems. The same lack of effect of phagocytosis and enzyme release was found. D-Cysteine did inhibit chemotaxis but to a lesser degree than D-penicillamine. This dicotomy of drug effect may indicate that the beneficial action of D-penicillamine in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is due to the decreased chemotaxis of polymorphonuclear leukocytes into the joint, while the absence of an effect of phagocytosis and lysosomal enzymes shows the cells can still function to ingest and destroy bacteria. This latter effect correlates with the absence of infection in patients treated with this compound.
H Chwalinska-Sadowska, J Baum
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 95 | 0 |
43 | 14 | |
Scanned page | 274 | 1 |
Citation downloads | 59 | 0 |
Totals | 471 | 15 |
Total Views | 486 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.