The changes in levels of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) of the intima and media of the human artery in atherosclerosis were determined by a recently introduced two-dimensional electrophoresis technique that permits direct measurments of each of these macromolecules. To identify the arterial GAGs, they were fractionated by chromatography on a DEAE-Sephadex A-25 column, and the resulting three fractions (hyaluronic acid [HA], heparan sulfate [HS], and the partially separated chondroitin sulfates B [CSB] and C [CSC]) were analyzed for their electrophoretic mobilities by this electrophoretic method, for their digestability by highly specific hydrolases (leech hyaluronidase, heparinase, and chondroitinases ABC and AC) and for their iduronic acid content. From these studies we concluded that normal and atherosclerotic human aortas contain CSB, CSC, HA, and HS. Further, we demonstrated that CSB is a hybrid consisting of approximately 40% CSA and 60% CSB and that CSC appears to be a polymer consisting essentially of glucuronic acid and N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfate. Classical CSA as well as chondroitin (CH) were not present in detectable amounts. In the relatively normal intima, the mean concentrations of the GAGs were found to be 4.7, 20.9, 1.3, and 5.1 mg/g of dry, defatted, decalcified tissue for CSB, CSC, HA, and HS, respectively. With the progression of atherosclerosis, there was a pronounced decrease in the total GAG content (from 32 to 18 mg) associated with a decrease in the CSC and HS levels but without a change in the HA concentrations. Of particular interest, however, was the increase in the CSB level. In the media whose total GAG content averaged approximately 20 mg, no significant changes in these GAG levels were noted with the progression of the disease except for that of CSC. These findings may be important in explaining the increased lipoprotein and collagen deposition in the diseased aorta.
R L Stevens, M Colombo, J J Gonzales, W Hollander, K Schmid
Usage data is cumulative from June 2024 through June 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 210 | 31 |
336 | 18 | |
Scanned page | 440 | 12 |
Citation downloads | 52 | 0 |
Totals | 1,038 | 61 |
Total Views | 1,099 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.