To see whether antihistamines could prevent and reverse histamine-induced pulmonary edema and increased lung vascular permeability, we compared the effects of a 4-h intravenous infusion of 4 mug/kg per min histamine phosphate on pulmonary hemodynamics, lung lymph flow, lymph and plasma protein content, arterial blood gases, hematocrit, and lung water with the effects of an identical histamine infusion given during an infusion of diphenhydramine or metiamide on the same variables in unanesthetized sheep. Histamine caused lymph flow to increase from 6.0+/-0.5 to 27.0+/-5.5 (SEM) ml/h (P less than 0.05), lymph; plasma globulin concentration ratio to increase from 0.62+/-0.01 to 0.67+/-0.02 (P less than 0.05), left atrial pressure to fall from 1+/-1 to -3+/-1 cm H2O (P less than 0.05), and lung lymph clearance of eight protein fractions ranging from 36 to 96 A molecular radius to increase significantly. Histamine also caused increases in lung water, pulmonary vascular resistance, arterial PCO2, pH, and hematocrit, and decreases in cardiac output and arterial PO2. Diphenhydramine (3 mg/kg before histamine followed by 1.5 mg/kg per h intravenous infusion) completely prevented the histamine effect on hematocrit, lung lymph flow, lymph protein clearance, and lung water content, and reduced histamine effects on arterial blood gases and pH. 6 mg/kg diphenhydramine given at the peak histamine response caused lymph flow and lymph: plasma protein concentration ratios to fall. Metiamide (10 mg/kg per h) did not affect the histamine lymph response. We conclude that diphenhydramine can prevent histamine-induced pulmonary edema and can prevent and reverse increased lung vascular permeability caused by histamine, and that histamine effects on lung vascular permeability are H1 actions.
K L Brigham, R E Bowers, P J Owen
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 159 | 1,029 |
53 | 24 | |
Scanned page | 309 | 32 |
Citation downloads | 62 | 0 |
Totals | 583 | 1,085 |
Total Views | 1,668 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.