A study of sera from 285 patients with definite or classical rheumatoid arthritis (including 37 patients receiving no anti-inflammatory drugs) and sera from 67 healthy subjects has confirmed 10 published reports of a statistically significant decreased blood histidine concentration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Contrastingly, in sera from 231 patients with a variety of acute and chronic illnesses other than rheumatoid arthritis, no statistically significant hypohistidinemia was observed either in the group as a whole or in association with the administration of aspirin, prednisone, indomethacin, phenylbutazone, or dextropropoxyphene. In the patients with rheumatoid arthritis there was a statistically significant correlation between the serum histidine concentration and the following: Westergren sedimentation rate (r=-0.33, P smaller than 10- minus 9), grip strength (r=0.26, P smaller than 10- minus 9), hematocrit (r=0.23, P smaller than 10- minus 9), duration of morning stiffness (r=-0.14, P=10- minus 5), walking time (r=-0.13, P=10- minus 4), latex titer of rheumatoid factor (r=-0.11, P=0.001), and the duration of arthritis (r=-0.06, P=0.05). There was no statistically significant association between the serum histidine concentration and the duration of rheumatoid arthritis in the 151 patients with disease of 0-10-yr duration (r=0.02, P=0.5), the sex of the patient, or the presence of antinuclear antibody (R=0.007, P=0.9). The serum histidine concentration was less in rheumatoid patients receiving steroids (P=0.00001), gold (P=0.009), and aspirin (P=0.15) than in rheumatoid patients not receiving these drugs. This study indicates that histidine determinations on properly preserved casual serum samples can be helpful in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and in the evaluation of the activity of the disease.
D A Gerber
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 246 | 7 |
130 | 29 | |
Scanned page | 429 | 42 |
Citation downloads | 49 | 0 |
Totals | 854 | 78 |
Total Views | 932 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.