Advertisement
Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI107731
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Find articles by Martin, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Find articles by Shaver, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Find articles by Leon, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Find articles by Thompson, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Find articles by Reddy, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Find articles by Leonard, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published July 1, 1974 - More info
Selective autonomic blockade with intravenous propranolol, practolol, atropine, and combined atropine-propranolol was utilized to elucidate the role of the autonomic nervous system in the hemodynamic responses in young adult male volunteers to handgrip sustained at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction for 3 min. The initial 30 s of the tachycardia response was found to be mediated by withdrawal of vagal dominance, as evidenced by blockade of this response by prior atropinization. The mid and late portion of the heart rate response curve was demonstrated to be sympathetic in origin, since it was unaffected by atropine, but was suppressed by combined atropine-propranolol blockade. Sympathetic stimulation appears to be a secondary mechanism for increasing the heart rate, however, as it becomes operative only after the first mechanism of vagal withdrawal has been utilized. This was confirmed by the finding that beta adrenergic receptor blockade alone had little effect on the heart rate response curve.
The pressor response to handgrip was accompanied by increased cardiac output and no change in calculated systemic vascular resistance. After propranolol, handgrip resulted in increased peripheral resistance and an equivalent rise in arterial pressure, but no increase in cardiac output. It was concluded that the increase in resistance was the result of sympathetically induced vasoconstriction. This response was shown to be independent of peripheral beta adrenergic receptor blockade by the use of practolol, a cardio-selective beta adrenergic receptor-blocking drug which caused identical hemodynamic responses to those observed after propranolol.
Left ventricular ejection time (corrected for heart rate) was prolonged by handgrip. The increased afterload imposed on the left ventricle by sustained handgrip may explain the prolongation of ejection time index. Preejection period was prolonged by SHG after propranolol and shortened after atropine. In addition to confirming the previously defined role of the parasympathetic nervous system, this study delineates the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the heart rate and pressor responses to sustained handgrip.