Isolated cat right ventricular papillary muscles were used to study the effects of antibodies with high affinity for ouabain and acetyl strophanthidin on myocardium exposed to these cardioactive steroids. Antibodies with average intrinsic affinity constants for ouabain and acetyl strophanthidin of the order of 108 M-1 were raised in rabbits challenged by repeated injection of a conjugate of ouabain covalently linked to a poly D,L-alanyl derivative of human serum albumin. Effects were assessed in terms of time-course and extent of inotropy reversal, influence of experimentally induced ventricular failure, digitalis-antibody concentration relations, influence of digitalis-antibody complex on response to additionally added digitalis, and relation of antibody effects on digitalis-induced automaticity and contracture to reversal of inotropy. Specific antibody (but not control antibody) in 1.1-1.5-fold molar excess over cardioactive steroid concentrations blocked positive inotropic effects of ouabain and acetyl strophanthidin, and gradually reversed established contractile effects of these agents with a mean time for half-reversal of ouabain-induced inotropy of 124±6 (SEM) min and 37±3 min for half-reversal of acetyl strophanthidin-induced inotropy. Papillary muscles from cats with right ventricular failure induced by chronic pulmonary artery constriction responded similarly. Both normal and failing muscles returned to but not below levels of contractility existing before cardioactive steroid exposure, and time for half-reversal of inotropy by antibody was significantly shorter than time for half-reversal after removal of ouabain or acetyl strophanthidin by muscle bath washout alone. Presence of ouabain- or acetyl strophanthidin-antibody complex did not alter the myocardial contractile response to subsequently added cardioactive steroids.
Herman K. Gold, Thomas W. Smith
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 88 | 0 |
43 | 17 | |
Scanned page | 199 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
Totals | 375 | 19 |
Total Views | 394 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.