Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1974;53(2):363-373. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107568.
Abstract
There are no data available concerning total coronary blood flow to the whole heart (CBF) in man. "Effective" or "nutrient" coronary blood flow to the whole heart (MBF), supposedly a measure of flow through exchanging channels of the coronary circulation, has been measured but its validity has not been established. Accordingly, CBF and MBF were measured in 9 normal subjects, 26 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), and 19 with noncoronary, mostly valvular heart disease (NCHD), by coincidence counting 84Rb technique. Two methods were used: single bolus (24 cases) and continuous infusion (30 cases). Various other parameters including myocardial oxygen utilization (MVO2) and lactate extraction ratio were determined. In the normal subjects CBF (386 +/- 77 ml/min) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in CHD (288 +/- 124 ml/min) and NCHD (292 +/- 111 ml/min). Likewise the normal MBF (380 +/- 81 ml/min) was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than in CHD (251 +/- 105 ml/min) as well as NCHD (258 +/- 104 ml/min). The myocardial Rb extraction ratio epsilon Rb) was significantly lower in normal subjects (39 +/- 9%) than in CHD (50 +/- 7%) and NCHD (52 +/- 11%) and this supports the view that epsilon Rb is flow-dependent. In both CHD and NCHD there was significant diminution of MVO2 as well as CBF. In CHD this was accompanied by a significant anaerobic trend but in NCHD it was not. It might therefore appear that in CHD, MVO2 is determined by perfusion whereas in NCHD, perfusion is determined by MVO2. In comparing CBF with MBF by paired observation testing, there was no significant difference in the normals (P > 0.3), whereas the differences were significant in CHD (P < 0.01) and NCHD (P < 0.02). This was merely a reflection of a reduced ratio of myocardial to total body epsilon Rb in CHD and NCHD, and available evidence indicates that this may be an expression of depressed transport of Rb+ rather than true shunting.
Authors
D Mymin, G P Sharma
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 131 | 8 |
| 49 | 17 | |
| Scanned page | 343 | 14 |
| Citation downloads | 42 | 0 |
| Totals | 565 | 39 |
| Total Views | 604 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)