Bacterial lipopolysaccharides from dead bacteria have been blamed for the continuing high mortality from gram-negative infections despite antibiotic treatment. Because animal antiserum against these lipopolysaccharides has been shown to protect against several of the effects of endotoxin, we undertook the development of antiserum in human subjects. 21 men were immunized with a single injection of Salmonclla typhimurium or Escherichia coli 0:111 heat-killed cells and immune serum was collected at 2 wk. Preimmune serum was obtained as a control in all animal experiments. 1 ml antiserum given intravenously protected mice against a lethal intravenous dose of homologous endotoxin (P < 0.005 for both antisera). E. coli antiserum reduced the incidence of positive local Shwartzman reactions with E. coli endotoxin from 100 to 38%; S. typhimurium antiserum reduced the incidence from 92 to 35%. (P < 0.0005 for both antisera). There was no protection against heterologous endotoxin in either animal model. These experiments demonstrate for the first time that human antiserum confers exceedingly potent passive immunity to the effects of endotoxin.
Elizabeth J. Ziegler, Herndon Douglas, Abraham I. Braude
Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 147 | 8 |
59 | 11 | |
Scanned page | 124 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 59 | 0 |
Totals | 389 | 21 |
Total Views | 410 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.