To test the possibility that the long-acting thyroid stimulator (LATS) might represent an immune complex either of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) with anti-TSH or of a subunit of TSH with an appropriate antibody, we immunized rabbits with bovine TSH (bTSH), bLH (luteinizing hormone), and their α and β subunits (bTSHα and bTSHβ). Binding, neutralizing, and nonneutralizing antibodies were demonstrated in the antisera obtained. First, antisera to TSH, TSHβ, and TSHα all bound [125I]TSH and [125I]TSHβ. Anti-bTSHβ antisera bound [125I]bTSHβ better than did anti-TSH sera, while the binding of [125I]bTSH was similar with both types of antiserum. Second, the thyroid-stimulating activity (McKenzie bioassay) of TSH could be neutralized by incubation with various dilutions of anti-TSH or anti-TSHβ. Finally, when incubation mixtures containing TSH and dilutions of anti-TSHβ antisera that only partially neutralized TSH were treated with an antiserum against rabbit immunoglobulins to precipitate immune complexes, the bioassay response of the TSH was abolished. This phenomenon was not observed when antiserum to the intact hormone was substituted in the incubation mixture. The removal of TSH biological activity from a mixture of TSH and anti-bTSHβ by addition of an anti-immunoglobulin indicated that biologically active immune complexes were formed between TSH and anti-TSHβ but not between TSH and anti-TSH. The time-course of the bioactivity and several other characteristics of these complexes differentiate them from LATS.
Gildon N. Beall, Inder J. Chopra, David H. Solomon, John G. Pierce, James S. Cornell
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 91 | 2 |
43 | 24 | |
Scanned page | 281 | 4 |
Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
Totals | 476 | 30 |
Total Views | 506 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.