Isolated preparations of portions of the canine intraventricular conducting system were studied by microelectrode techniques in order to determine the nature of transverse spread and longitudinal dissociation of impulses in bundle branches and false tendons. Driving stimuli were delivered to an eccentric location on normal conducting tissue, and the arrival times of the propagating impulses were mapped along the length and width of the bundle branch, or along the false tendon ipsilateral and contralateral to the site of stimulation. The difference between the arrival times on the two sides was found to decrease progressively as a function of distance from the site of stimulation, the data suggesting that transverse spread of impulses involves propagation through transverse crossover points between the longitudinally oriented conducting elements. Impulses originating eccentrically became uniformly conducted across the transverse axis of bundle branches 8-15 mm from the level of the stimulating electrode, and of false tendons 2-4 mm from the stimulus site. True longitudinal dissociation, producing conduction maps different from those representing normal transverse propagation, was seen occasionally in tissue having longitudinally oriented strips of abnormal tissue. However, early premature stimulation commonly resulted in longitudinal temporal dissociation of the premature responses, possibly due to functional block in the transverse crossover fibers.
Robert J. Myerburg, Kristina Nilsson, Benjamin Befeler, Agustin Castellanos Jr., Henry Gelband
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 89 | 2 |
49 | 25 | |
Scanned page | 353 | 7 |
Citation downloads | 44 | 0 |
Totals | 535 | 34 |
Total Views | 569 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.