Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (37)

Advertisement

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI107237

Pharmacodynamic Studies of Beta Adrenergic Antagonism Induced in Man by Propranolol and Practolol

Gunter Bodem, H. L. Brammell, John V. Weil, and Charles A. Chidsey

Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado 80220

Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado 80220

Find articles by Bodem, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado 80220

Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado 80220

Find articles by Brammell, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado 80220

Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado 80220

Find articles by Weil, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado 80220

Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Medical Center, Denver, Colorado 80220

Find articles by Chidsey, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Published April 1, 1973 - More info

Published in Volume 52, Issue 4 on April 1, 1973
J Clin Invest. 1973;52(4):747–754. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107237.
© 1973 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published April 1, 1973 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

The pharmacodynamic activities of two beta adrenergic antagonists, propranolol and practolol, were compared in eight hypertensive patients. The activity of each antagonist was established in relation to its blood concentration at maximal and submaximal adrenergic blockade defined by inhibition of exercise tachycardia. Maximal inhibition of exercise tachycardia was comparable with both drugs and averaged 74±7% of the control value during drug treatment. This inhibition was achieved with a blood concentration of 2.5±0.4 μg/ml practolol and 0.10±0.08 μg/ml propranolol. The antagonist activities of these drugs against adrenergic stimulation with isoproterenol infusion indicated a much greater relative potency of propranolol against this stimulus, and in vivo estimates of PA2 values differed by more than 600-fold. Relative antagonist activity of practolol during isoproterenol stimulation was equivalent both at cardiac (inotropic and chronotropic) and at vascular adrenergic receptors, whereas greater antagonist activity of propranolol was observed at vascular receptors than at cardiac receptors. Thus, the activity of practolol was not limited to cardiac receptors as previously suggested. Practolol did not reduce cardiac output at any dose level and the effect on resting blood pressure was small. Both practolol and propranolol had much greater hypotensive activity during exercise. These studies have defined the differing pharmacodynamic activities on the cardiovascular system of two effective beta adrenergic receptor antagonists and have established the blood levels of these antagonists necessary to achieve effective adrenergic blockade.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 747
page 747
icon of scanned page 748
page 748
icon of scanned page 749
page 749
icon of scanned page 750
page 750
icon of scanned page 751
page 751
icon of scanned page 752
page 752
icon of scanned page 753
page 753
icon of scanned page 754
page 754
Version history
  • Version 1 (April 1, 1973): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article (37)

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts