Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1973;52(3):592-598. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107220.
Abstract
The effectiveness of various antibiotics commonly recommended for the prophylaxis of bacterial endocarditis has been evaluated in experimental streptococcal endocarditis in rabbits. High doses of penicillin G did not prevent the development of this infection. The only consistently successful prophylactic regimens using penicillin alone were those which provided for both an early high serum level and more than 9 h of effective antimicrobial action. Vancomycin was the only other drug which proved uniformly successful when given alone, even though the duration of its antimicrobial action in the blood was only 3 h. However, combined therapy using penicillin G or ampicillin with streptomycin was always effective in prophylaxis. Treatment with single injections of ampicillin, cephaloridine, cephalexin, clindamycin, cotrimoxazole, rifampicin, streptomycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline failed to prevent infection.
Authors
David T. Durack, Robert G. Petersdorf
Usage data is cumulative from November 2023 through November 2024.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 151 | 1 |
| 99 | 27 | |
| Scanned page | 282 | 2 |
| Citation downloads | 61 | 0 |
| Totals | 593 | 30 |
| Total Views | 623 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2024 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)