Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Amendment history:
  • Errata (April 1973)

Research Article Free access | 10.1172/JCI107158

Some Characteristics of the Rabbit Vermiform Appendix as a Secreting Organ

William D. Blackwood, Robin A. Bolinger, and Nathan Lifson

Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Section, Veterans Administration Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417

Department of Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

Find articles by Blackwood, W. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Section, Veterans Administration Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417

Department of Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

Find articles by Bolinger, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Section, Veterans Administration Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417

Department of Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

Find articles by Lifson, N. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published January 1, 1973 - More info

Published in Volume 52, Issue 1 on January 1, 1973
J Clin Invest. 1973;52(1):143–152. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107158.
© 1973 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published January 1, 1973 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

It has been confirmed that the rabbit vermiform appendix secretes spontaneously at a relatively rapid rate (1-12 ml·h-1; 1.4±0.24 μl·min-1·cm-2). The electrolyte composition is similar to that of ileal fluids and independent of the secretory rate. The transmural potential difference is about 12 mV, mucosa negative. Of the major electrolytes, only HCO3- is secreted grossly against its electrochemical potential difference. This finding plus the low hydraulic (or osmotic) permeability (Lp) and high secretory pressures of the organ strongly suggest that the secretion is an active one. The passive permeability to Na+ and Cl- appears to be, at most, somewhat less than for small bowel. Permeability to mannitol was estimated at 2.5 × 10-7 cm·s-1. On the basis of reasonable assumptions and results with luminal test solutions of differing osmolarities, it was concluded that (a) the Lp of the appendiceal epithelium is in the lower range of values reported for small bowel and colon; (b) the Lp is higher for osmotic absorption than for osmotic secretion; and (c) the rate of spontaneous secretion is insensitive to luminal anisotonicity over a wide range of values. But sufficiently hypotonic solutions can reverse net secretion to net absorption, more by inhibiting spontaneous secretion than increasing osmotic absorption. The rabbit vermiform appendix appears to be a useful model for the elucidation of intestinal secretory processes.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 143
page 143
icon of scanned page 144
page 144
icon of scanned page 145
page 145
icon of scanned page 146
page 146
icon of scanned page 147
page 147
icon of scanned page 148
page 148
icon of scanned page 149
page 149
icon of scanned page 150
page 150
icon of scanned page 151
page 151
icon of scanned page 152
page 152
Version history
  • Version 1 (January 1, 1973): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts