21 patients with Paget's disease of bone and one with osteoporosis were studied to detect development of antibodies to salmon calcitonin during chronic therapy. Antibody titers ranged from 1:40 to 1:30,000 in plasma obtained after treatment of 11 patients. Radio-immunoelectrophoresis revealed that the antibodies were restricted to the γG class. One patient, W. O., with Paget's disease initially responded to treatment with a decrease in bone turnover, but later became resistant to the hormone in association with the appearance of a very high titer (1:30,000) of antibody against salmon calcitonin. A 1:10 dilution of his plasma was shown to completely inactivate 20 mMRC units/ml of salmon calcitonin as detected by bioassay in rats; slight inactivation was detected at a 1:200 dilution. All other patients continued to respond to salmon calcitonin despite the development of antibody to the hormone in ten cases. No evidence of systemic allergic reactions or other toxicity was found in any patient. The data suggest that although antibody formation may occur in as many as 50% of patients treated with salmon calcitonin, this antibody response is unlikely to be of clinical significance in most patients. However, in an occasional patient, a marked antibody response may occur which interferes with the therapeutic use of the hormone.
Frederick R. Singer, J. Phillip Aldred, Robert M. Neer, Stephen M. Krane, John T. Potts, Kurt J. Bloch
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 126 | 1 |
48 | 29 | |
Scanned page | 277 | 3 |
Citation downloads | 40 | 0 |
Totals | 491 | 33 |
Total Views | 524 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.