Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

The Genesis of Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure: Its Identification through the Use of Gastrin Antiserum
William Lipshutz, … , William Hughes, Sidney Cohen
William Lipshutz, … , William Hughes, Sidney Cohen
Published March 1, 1972
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1972;51(3):522-529. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106840.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

The Genesis of Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure: Its Identification through the Use of Gastrin Antiserum

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of gastrin in the genesis of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure by the use of a high titer gastrin antiserum. Intravenous infusions of increasing amounts of rabbit gastrin antiserum, but not control antiserum, produced graded reductions in the resting LES pressure in anesthetized opossums. A maximal inhibition in LES pressure of 80.0±3.1% (mean ±SE) was achieved when gastrin antiserum was administered in an amount estimated to bind almost all endogenous circulating gastrin in the opossum. Gastrin antiserum also inhibited the LES response to endogenous gastrin release (gastric deacidification) and to exogenous intravenous administration of gastrin I. The inhibition of the LES response to exogenous gastrin I by gastrin antiserum could be eliminated by giving excess gastrin I. Studies performed in vitro showed that gastrin antiserum inhibited the contractile response of LES circular muscle to gastrin I, but not to acetylcholine. These studies indicate that gastrin antiserum: (a) specifically antagonized the response of LES circular muscle to gastrin, in vitro; (b) diminished the LES response to the endogenous release and to the exogenous administration of gastrin; and (c) markedly reduced the resting level of LES pressure. We conclude that endogenous gastrin is the major determinant of resting LES pressure.

Authors

William Lipshutz, William Hughes, Sidney Cohen

×

Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 106 4
PDF 51 14
Scanned page 281 2
Citation downloads 55 0
Totals 493 20
Total Views 513
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts