Hemoglobin Gun Hill is an unstable mutant hemoglobin associated with mild compensated hemolysis. This abnormal protein has a deletion of five amino acids in the β-chains. The deletion includes the heme-binding proximal histidine at position 92. The β-chains of hemoglobin Gun Hill lack heme groups. Approximately 32% of the circulating hemoglobin in heterozygous subjects consists of the mutant hemoglobin. When reticulocytes were incubated with radioactive amino acid the specific activity of hemoglobin Gun Hill was three to six times that of hemoglobin A. Total incorporation of radioactivity into hemoglobin Gun Hill was two to three times that into hemoglobin A. There were 20-50% more total counts in β-Gun Hill (βGH) than in βA. These results indicate that in reticulocytes there was greater synthesis of the abnormal β-chains than βA-chains. The ratio of the specific activities of the α-chains of hemoglobin Gun Hill to the α-chains of hemoglobin A was 20: 1. There was evidence of a free pool of α-chains in the reticulocytes containing hemoglobin Gun Hill. After 10 min of incubation approximately 40% of the total α-chain radioactivity was in the free pool. When protein synthesis was blocked by incubation of reticulocytes with puromycin, the specific activity of the α-chains of hemoglobin Gun Hill continued to increase due to direct exchange of α-subunits between the free pool and preformed hemoglobin Gun Hill. Studies of the assembly of βA and βGH revealed that the rates of translation of the two polypeptide chains were equal and uniform. No evidence was obtained for the existence of “slow points” in the process of globin chain assembly. The studies also suggest that lack of strong heme-globin binding does not hinder the synthesis of globin chains.
Ronald F. Rieder
Usage data is cumulative from September 2023 through September 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 317 | 0 |
83 | 32 | |
Scanned page | 430 | 33 |
Citation downloads | 27 | 0 |
Totals | 857 | 65 |
Total Views | 922 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.