Three adult human subjects were maintained for 7 days (period I) on a protein-free formula diet containing the minimum daily requirements of the eight essential amino acids plus 40 g glycine. During the last 5 days of this period, the average daily nitrogen balances for the three subjects were +0.52, +0.71, and +0.30 g, respectively. During the next 7 days (period II), valine was withdrawn from the diet, and the glycine ration increased by an equimolar amount. During the last 5 days of period II, average daily nitrogen balances declined to -1.82, -1.61, and -1.87 g, respectively. In the final period of 7 days (period III), the keto analogue of valine, α-ketoisovaleric acid, was added to the diet in a quantity equimolar to the minimum daily requirement of valine. During the last 5 days of this period, average daily nitrogen balances improved to -0.02, -0.18, and -0.83 g, respectively. Analogous experiments in three subjects involved the withdrawal from the diet of phenylalanine (period II) and replacement by its keto analogue, phenylpyruvic acid (period III). The average daily nitrogen balances were as follows: period I: +1.04, +0.96, and +0.53 g; period II: -1.45, -1.83, and -1.94 g; period III: +0.07, +0.11, and -0.52 g.
Daniel Rudman
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 105 | 2 |
68 | 32 | |
Scanned page | 212 | 8 |
Citation downloads | 37 | 0 |
Totals | 422 | 42 |
Total Views | 464 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.