Congenital erythropoietic porphyria, an autosomal recessive inborn error of heme biosynthesis, results from the markedly deficient activity of uroporphyrinogen III synthase. Extensive mutation analyses of 40 unrelated patients only identified approximately 90% of mutant alleles. Sequencing the recently discovered erythroid-specific promoter in six patients with a single undefined allele identified four novel mutations clustered in a 20-bp region: (a) a –70T to C transition in a putative GATA-1 consensus binding element, (b) a –76G to A transition, (c) a –86C to A transversion in three unrelated patients, and (d) a –90C to A transversion in a putative CP2 binding motif. Also, a –224T to C polymorphism was present in approximately 4% of 200 unrelated Caucasian alleles. We inserted these mutant sequences into luciferase reporter constructs. When transfected into K562 erythroid cells, these constructs yielded 3 ± 1, 54 ± 3, 43 ± 6, and 8 ± 1%, respectively, of the reporter activity conferred by the wild-type promoter. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays indicated that the –70C mutation altered GATA1 binding, whereas the adjacent –76A mutation did not. Similarly, the –90C mutation altered CP2 binding, whereas the –86A mutation did not. Thus, these four pathogenic erythroid promoter mutations impaired erythroid-specific transcription, caused CEP, and identified functionally important GATA1 and CP2 transcriptional binding elements for erythroid-specific heme biosynthesis.
Constanza Solis, Gerardo I. Aizencang, Kenneth H. Astrin, David F. Bishop, Robert J. Desnick
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 260 | 68 |
140 | 43 | |
Figure | 48 | 5 |
Table | 160 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 39 | 0 |
Totals | 647 | 116 |
Total Views | 763 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.