Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1970;49(4):779-790. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106291.
Abstract
We investigated the effects of isoproterenol on the pulmonary mechanics of eight healthy male subjects. We measured the flow-volume, pressure-volume, resistance-volume, and pressure-flow relationships of the lungs of our subjects in addition to the forced expiratory volume (FEV1). The results of this study confirm earlier observations that isoproterenol produces a considerable decrease in airway resistance but only small changes in maximum expiratory flow. Measurements of static pressure-volume curves showed that isoproterenol caused a temporary decrease in the elastic recoil pressure of the lungs. In five men there were mean falls in recoil pressure of 4.1 cm H2O at 85% total lung capacity (TLC), 2.6 cm H2O at 75% TLC, and 1.5 cm H2O at 50% TLC. We postulate that the reason for the relatively small increments in maximum expiratory flow after isoproterenol is primarily that the effects of airway dilatation are in large part negated by the reduction in lung recoil pressure, which results in a fall in the maximum effective driving force for expiratory air flow, and secondly that there is an increase in the compliance of the flow-limiting airways. These studies emphasize that tests of maximum flow and of airway resistance should not be regarded as invariably interchangeable in the assessment of airway reactions or mild disease of the airways.
Authors
E. R. McFadden Jr., Jan Newton-Howes, N. B. Pride
Usage data is cumulative from April 2024 through April 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 109 | 5 |
| 45 | 19 | |
| Scanned page | 473 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 57 | 0 |
| Totals | 684 | 27 |
| Total Views | 711 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)