A series of experiments were performed upon intact anesthetized dogs to determine the relevance of a variety of hemodynamic variables to the irregular ventricular performance associated with atrial fibrillation. During experimentally induced atrial fibrillation central aortic pulse pressure was measured in relation to the duration of the preceding diastolic interval, the relative degree of cycle-length change, the magnitude of the preceding aortic end-diastolic pressure, the rate of ventricular tension development (at a fixed diastolic tension), and to ventricular end-diastolic pressure. While all of the latter variables bore a significant relation to the chosen parameters of ventricular function, the most linear correlation lay with the rate of ventricular tension development. It has been suggested, as a consequence, that the irregular ventricular performance observed during atrial fibrillation under these experimental conditions, may be more directly related to variation in the inotropic state of the ventricular myocardium than to an expression of the Frank-Starling concept, resulting from variable ventricular filling. The lability of the inotropic or contractile state has in turn been attributed to abrupt cycle-length change effecting inotropic alteration analogous to postextrasystolic potentiation of contractility and, at rapid rates, effecting an alternation of the contractile state.
Robert E. Edmands, Kalman Greenspan, Charles Fisch
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 113 | 1 |
53 | 19 | |
Scanned page | 304 | 5 |
Citation downloads | 50 | 0 |
Totals | 520 | 25 |
Total Views | 545 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.